Real History of Taj Mahal: Taj Mahal History & The True Story

BBC Says ...........

Taj ...........

A hidden truth ..........

Never say that .........

It's a Tomb ..........

Purushottam Nagesh Oak (March 2, 1917 - December 4, 2007), commonly referred to as P. N. Oak, was an Indian writer and self-styled Professor, notable for his historical revisionism. Oak's "Institute for Rewriting Indian History" issued a quarterly periodical called Itihas Patrika in the 1980s.

Prof.P.N.Oak of New Delhi, put forward a theory in 1965 that the Taj Mahal was not a mausoleum built by Shahjahan but a Rajput Palace. In 1968 he found a confession to that effect in Shahjahan's official chronicle Badshahnama and in 1974 he came across Au rangzeb's letter of 1652 [the year when Taj Mahal is supposed to have been just completed] complaining that Taj Mahal was leaking all over.

Even today many rooms of the Taj Mahal

had closed since

Shah Jahan's period , which are beyond the reach of common people.

Pro. Oak., Insists that the Hindu temples and religious rituals to worship the idol of Lord Shiva, the trident, vase and etc are used goods .......

In 1981, V.S. Godbole research went deeper. He Said, " Were the British scholars just a third neutral party who were misled by the prolonged misuse of Hindu buildings as Mosques and Tombs and were not cunning enough to see through chauvinistic Muslim claims ???

Or did they know the truth about Taj Mahal and other monuments all along but had, for political reasons, vowed to hide the truth ? "

Badshah Nama, according to the place of Mumtaz was buried .........

As Mumtaz Mahal at Burhanpur in Madhya Pradesh - ul - Zmaani that died .......

Here is a typical tower (Burj) that is in familiar Rajput style, not Islamic in any way.

The timber door where Prof. Marvin Mills took the sample that proved the Taj predates Shajahan

There is lot of sophistry and casuistry or atleast confused thinking associated with the Taj even in the minds of proffesional historians, archaelogists and architects. At the outset they assert that the Taj is entirely Muslim in design. But when it is pointed out that its lotus capped dome and the four corner pillars etc. are all entirely Hindu those worthies shift ground and argue that that was probably because the workmen were Hindu and were to introduce their own patterns. Both these arguments are wrong because Muslim accounts claim the designers to be Muslim,and the workers invariably carry out the employer's dictates.

The Taj is only a typical illustration of how all historic buildings and townships from Kashmir to Cape Comorin though of Hindu origin have been ascribed to this or that Muslim ruler or courtier.

It is hoped that people the world over who study Indian history will awaken to this new finding and revise their erstwhile beliefs.

Those interested in an indepth study of the above and many other revolutionary rebuttals may read this author's other research books.

To prove Pro. PN. Oak's research false, their is

only one way,

that the current Central Government under the supervision of the UN open and check the closed rooms, and let international experts investigate it....

Just think ....!!!!!!

It brings with it many memories concerned Mumtaz - ul -

Zmaani

Why ........???????

Except Prof. Oak. no one has ever challenged the statement that ........

"Taj Mahal was built by Shah Jahan"

Entrance to lower basement floor that is now bricked up.

The blue print plan of the Taj Mahal showing stairways that go down to the 22 basement rooms.

Blue print of the Taj Mahal showing cross-section of Central Edifice in a book by J Fergusson in 1855

An early photo of Taj from the riverside clearly showing 2 hidden basements

In his book "TAJ MAHAL - THE TRUE STORY" , he believe in that - The whole world is in illusion that the beautiful building Taj Mahal was built by Mughal emperor Shah Jahan .....

Oak says that ......

Taj Mahal Tomb of Mumtaz Begum from commencement was an ancient Hindu Shiva Temple which was then known as Tejo Mahaaly.

During his research Oak discovered that S

hah Jahan was illegally taken away

the Shiva temple of Maharaja Jai Singh of Jaipur.

• The ending "Mahal"is never muslim because in none of the muslim countries around the world from Afghanistan to Algeria is there a building known as "Mahal".
• The unusual explanation of the term Tajmahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal, who is buried in it, is illogical in at least two respects viz., firstly her name was never Mumtaj Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani and secondly one cannot omit the first three letters "Mum" from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name of the building.
• Since the lady's name was Mumtaz (ending with 'Z') the name of the building derived from her should have been Taz Mahal, if at all, and not Taj (spelled with a 'J').
• Several European visitors of Shahjahan's time allude to the building as Taj-e-Mahal is almost the correct tradition, age old Sanskrit name Tej-o-Mahalaya, signifying a Shiva temple. Contrarily Shahjahan and Aurangzeb scrupulously avoid using the Sanskrit term and call it just a holy grave.
• The tomb should be understood to signify NOT A BUILDING but only the grave or centotaph inside it. This would help people to realize that all dead muslim courtiers and royalty including Humayun, Akbar, Mumtaz, Etmad-ud-Daula and Safdarjang have been buried in capture Hindu mansions and temples.
• The term Taj Mahal is a corrupt form of the sanskrit term TejoMahalay signifying a Shiva Temple. Agreshwar Mahadev i.e., The Lord of Agra was consecrated in it.
• The tradition of removing the shoes before climbing the marble platform originates from pre Shahjahan times when the Taj was a Shiva Temple. Had the Taj originated as a tomb, shoes need not have to be removed because shoes are a necessity in a cemetery.
• Visitors may notice that the base slab of the centotaph is the marble basement in plain white while its superstructure and the other three centotaphs on the two floors are covered with inlaid creeper designs. This indicates that the marble pedestal of the Shiva idol is still in place and Mumtaz's centotaphs are fake.
• There are persons who are connected with the repair and the maintainance of the Taj who have seen the ancient sacred Shiva Linga and other idols sealed in the thick walls and in chambers in the secret, sealed red stone stories below the marble basement. The Archaeological Survey of India is keeping discretely, politely and diplomatically silent about it to the point of dereliction of its own duty to probe into hidden historical evidence.